The Yardi numbers forecast 440,000 units will be delivered in the top 30 metros, while we expect demand for 290,000 apartment units.
Multifamily development has ratcheted up in recent years, with more than 600,000 units delivered over the last two years and the same amount to be delivered in 2018 and 2019. Is the industry simply meeting the needs of the growing population or are we overbuilding?
A study by Yardi Matrix of demand and supply trends in the top 30 U.S. metros by population over the next five years found that multifamily deliveries may outpace demand in some of the top 30 U.S. metros over the next two years. That should create volatility as some markets and submarkets with outsized development activity experience rising vacancy rates and stagnating rent growth.
In the near term, markets at risk of oversupply include Denver, Seattle, Charlotte, Dallas, Phoenix and Miami, where deliveries are expected to outpace demand. Investors and developers can still find attractive deals in those markets, but submarket and site selection will become even more important.
The opposite holds true in markets where supply and demand appear to be in balance. In many markets, most development is taking place in the urban core, which may create opportunities in growing and urbanizing suburban areas.
Over the longer term, the supply picture is more balanced. Demand remains healthy, but we expect construction will moderate after the more than 600,000 units currently under construction are completed. Most of the metros that are at short-term risk of oversupply have strong economies and healthy multifamily demand, so units coming online should be absorbed by growing populations. Plus, developers will pull back the throttle if occupancy rates wane much.
Metros with the most deliveries relative to projected demand long-term include Seattle, Charlotte, Dallas and St. Louis. Metros with the most favorable demand/supply metrics include:
- Los Angeles
- Inland Empire
- San Diego
Multifamily has had a great run over the last six years. The recent increase in deliveries – 620,000 units were completed in 2016 and 2017 combined, per Yardi Matrix – has helped compensate for the construction shortage in the wake of the Great Recession. But demand is not unlimited, and developers must intelligently calibrate the amount and location of new projects.
The Yardi numbers forecast 440,000 units will be delivered in the top 30 metros, while we expect demand for 290,000 apartment units. Supply growth is led by the New York metro, Dallas, Washington D.C., Los Angeles, Denver and Miami, all of which have at least 25,000 units under construction right now. Metros projected to have the highest amount of new demand are New York, Los Angeles, Washington D.C., Houston and Miami.
Metros in which supply is expected to exceed demand the most as a percentage of stock include:
Deliveries in each of these markets over the next two years are at least 2.5 percent more than the amount of expected demand. These markets have largely performed well in recent years, but the supply/demand imbalance will put a strain on rent growth and occupancy rates.
On the other side of the equation, metros in which demand is expected to exceed supply include:
- Los Angeles
- Inland Empire
- New York
- San Diego
Demand is expected to exceed supply in each of these metros by 1.0 percent or more. Fundamentals should remain strong in these markets, although affordability is constraining rent growth in many submarkets in New York and Los Angeles.
Our numbers forecast 617,000 new apartment units in the top 30 metros over five years, with demand for 677,000 units. Deliveries in New York, Washington, Dallas, Los Angeles and Miami encompass about 250,000 units, or 40 percent of the total new development. Metros with the most projected demand for apartments are New York, Los Angeles, Washington D.C., Chicago and Houston.
Metros in which forecast supply exceeds demand the most as a percentage of stock includes: Seattle, Charlotte, Dallas and St. Louis. Metros which have the most favorable demand/supply metrics include:
- Los Angeles
- Inland Empire
- San Diego
These projections come with some caveats. One is that long-term forecasts have some elasticity. Projects not yet under construction can and will be delayed if demand proves to be weak and occupancies and rents begin to slip. On the flip side, if demand exceeds supply, the timeline for many projects will speed up. Another caveat is that our demand methodology assumes that the percentage of apartment renters will remain constant over the five-year period. If future residents occupy apartments at a different rate, that could affect demand in individual metros.
Social Trends Affect Demand
This study was based broadly on population growth and homeownership trends. Other factors that impact demand for housing could change the direction of household formation. For example, the strong job market since 2010 has encouraged household formation, but that would change if the economy hits a downturn. Other demographic and lifestyle trends include:
- Whether job growth will be concentrated in urban areas with educated workers.
- The growth in the gig economy, which encourages mobility found in rentals and makes it more difficult to qualify for mortgages.
- Trends in transportation, such as fewer young people with driver licenses and development of driverless cars.
- Commuting preferences, which could concentrate development in inner-ring suburbs.
- Immigration policy. Immigrants tend to settle in big coastal markets.
- Land use, increasing use of infill locations for housing as opposed to far-flung suburbs. The cost of infill land has reached the point where development has become difficult for anything other than luxury apartments.
- Preference for the live-work-play lifestyle with access to amenities such as restaurants and shopping, which favors urban areas and transit-oriented development suburbs.
The study assumes that homeownership will continue to rebound. Millennials and Generation X households have reached an age when their earnings will grow, many will pay off student debt and begin to have children. That will start a search for better schools and more space to raise families. What’s more, rapidly increasing apartment rents make owning a home cheaper by comparison.
Conclusion: Deep Into Cycle, Margin For Error Thins
Although there are uncertainties, some general lessons that seem clear:
- Demand will be healthy, but it is not unlimited. Our calculation forecasts demand for 135,000 to 145,000 multifamily units per year in the top 30 metros, which represent about two-thirds of the population and demand in the U.S. The recent trend in deliveries is more than 300,000 per year. If that trend continues, occupancy rates can only be maintained under the most favorable demand and economic scenarios.
- It might take time, but metros with strong economic and population growth will ultimately absorb supply. Markets with educated workforces, attractive lifestyle amenities and healthy business climates are growing the fastest. Examples of these markets include Dallas, Houston, Atlanta and Charlotte. Orlando and Las Vegas are among the projected growth leaders, although those metros’ economies are more fragile, being dependent on tourism, and by extension the economic health of the country.
- Don’t turn out the lights in core markets such as New York, San Francisco and Los Angeles. Core metros remain critical as hubs of industry, and they remain aspirational landing spots for highly educated young workers and immigrants. Absolute numbers favor primary metros, even if percentage growth is higher elsewhere.
Looking forward, the industry needs to find ways to develop housing that is affordable without overbuilding in a way that disrupts business models. New stock is positive on several levels, such as: to revitalize urban areas, add residential units near transportation hubs, to meet demand for modern amenities. Building more units also remains the best way to alleviate the affordability problem. Even so, demand has its limits, and as deliveries accumulate, the margin for error gets thinner. •