Lou Barnes weekly investor review: Russian crisis sends more investor money here

by | Mar 31, 2014 | Article, Topics

1-11-14 lou barnes for author profilesThe action has been overseas this past week, with little new economic data, all forces — anxiety, mostly — pushing long-term rates lower.

Domestic information was on the weak side of hopes. Orders for durable goods, net of volatile items crept up 0.2% in February. Pending sales of homes continued to slide, now down 10.5% year-over-year, purchase-loan applications down about 16% year over year.

Overseas, China’s manufacturing purchasing managers index (PMI)Ā  continued its drop in negative territory, 48.1 in March from 48.5. Weather gets the blame for everything here, but not there. The European Central Bank (ECB) in a grand mixture of blessings leaked intentions to do more to stimulate Europe’s economy, a simultaneous confession of the absence of recovery.

Dominating everything: Tsar Vladimir Putin’s intentions. When the world is worried it buys U.S. Treasurys. It is difficult to explain higher bond prices and lower rates here except as safe-haven buying. There are unusually few safe places to go today, Europe and Japan unattractive, and the yuan not yet a true international currency.

The more Russia sours, the more money comes here, so this is not a U.S. scare story. Today an exploration of the center of the Russian issues and possibilities for readers not used to them, or too young to remember the last times around.

To begin, Russia is perpetually aggrieved, feeling oppressed by outsiders. In its westernmost advance, defeating Napoleon, it occupied Paris 200 years ago this weekend. Tsarist rot overtook Russia for the next hundred years. It lost its western provinces at Versailles in 1919. From 1945-1989 it pushed west once more, in Mr. Churchill’s phrase “An iron curtain from Stettin in the Baltic to Trieste in the Adriatic.”

When in 1989 the Soviet Union again collapsed of its internal rot, George H.W. Bush did exactly the right thing. Nothing. No pursuit, no land-grabbing, nothing to engender a violent response from a cornered Russia. NATO has expanded, but France and Germany wisely denied membership to Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, and Georgia for three reasons: not to humiliate Russia; second so that buffer states would separate NATO and Russia from direct borders; and third because these unfortunate provinces can’t be defended by force by NATO. Since the last Ice Age, living on flat ground anywhere in Europe has been ill-advised.

Putin in 2005: “The demise of the Soviet Union was the greatest geopolitical catastrophe the century.” Acting now as though he means to rectify the matter brings a shiver to all of Europe. Vladimir is no Hitler or Stalin, but Mussolini would do. Politicians including tyrants are given to overstatement. Maybe that’s all there is to this. But Europe has taken a collective vow, after the experience of the last century, never again shall we redraw borders with armies.

Putin is emboldened by the power of Russia’s fossil fuel reserves and weakness in the West. However, if he intends to stop with Crimea and low-level undermining of Ukraine, then this is all a minor adventure. Sad and troublesome, but no big deal.

Even a rapid military grab for Ukraine would not trigger NATO military action. More serious sanctions to be sure, Europe making both the sacrifice and the decisions resulting in a slower global economy — but still possibly a benefit here.

However: study the maps (below in e-version). If Putin absorbs the western buffer states, Belarus already in his orbit, then Russia will directly border NATO. The three Baltic states each has a large population of ethnic Russians. Between the Baltic states and Poland, retained in the 1989 collapse, lies the Russian Kalinin Military District, a major base and home port of the Russian Baltic Fleet.

If Russia again borders those states, they and Poland at least must re-arm, and each may call on NATO Article Five for mutual self-defense. The process of demilitarizing Europe was long and bloody, but so thoroughly done that Europe unaided could not pacify Serbia, or defeat Libya. Europe’s economy is no help.

Domino theories have gotten deservedly bad names. But in this situation there is only one domino separating Russia and NATO. That is a big deal.

Ā —————————————————————–

Ā 10-year T-note in 2014. Ascending bottoms, but easily holding tight, low range. Click on the charts below to enlarge.

3-28-14 lou chart 1

Mortgage bankers make only about half of all new loans, but its activity index is representative. The tail in housing is now significant, not supporting the economy, and weak job growth can’t support housing.

3-28-14 lou chart 2

The Chicago Fed’s 85-component index of the economy isn’t going anywhere.

3-28-14 Lou chart 3

Europe today. Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, and Georgia act as buffer states. All other nations west of Russia are in NATO. Note the little yellow wedge between Poland and Lithuania, the Kalinin Military District is the large base of the Russian Baltic Fleet.

3-28-14 lou chart 4

Europe from 1945 until 1989, when the Iron Curtain fell. The high water mark of Soviet Russia.

3-28-14 lou chart 5

Europe in 1938.

3-28-14 lou chart 6

And Europe as it was in 1914 before World War I, and Russia as it had been for more than 200 years. Note no independent Poland, Finland, or Baltic states — all parts of Russia, as Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova, and Georgia. Germany had been unified for only 50 years.

3-28-14 lou chart 7

Categories | Article | Topics
Tags |
  • Danny Johnson

    Danny Johnson has flipped hundreds of houses over the last 11+ years in San Antonio, Texas. He blogs about flipping houses at FlippingJunkie.com and is the author of "Flipping Houses Exposed: 34 Weeks in the Life of a Successful House Flipper," a best-selling book on Amazon. He also provides real estate investor websites atĀ www.LeadPropeller.com.

Related Posts

0 Comments

Submit a Comment